Raymark Roofing Pty Ltd
Trading name of RAYMARK ROOFING PTY. LTD. · Hobart, TAS
AustralianRoofers Trust Score New
How it's calculated: a transparent, evidence-weighted score — identity & longevity from the public ABN register, reputation from verified Google reviews, and consistency from cross-checking independent platforms. Grades are proportional to the evidence. Where we search the register and can't confirm a business, the identity check scores zero rather than being quietly left out — so a firm we couldn't verify never outranks one we could. Longevity stays unscored in that case, because without a registration date there's nothing to measure.
Our honest take
On paper, Raymark Roofing is one of the more established operations among the Hobart roofers we've reviewed. It's a genuine private company — ABN active since January 2000, GST-registered, based in Mornington where its workshop actually is — and in 2023 it registered a second business name, Fall Protection Systems Tasmania, suggesting a roof-safety sideline. The firm's own site says it was established in 1998, does residential and commercial work, and holds Housing Industry Association and Master Builders memberships — those last claims are theirs, and worth confirming if they matter to you.
The review picture is where it gets uncomfortable, and we won't dress it up: 2.8 stars from six Google ratings is the lowest band you'll see. But the detail matters. The breakdown is three one-star ratings, one four-star and two five-stars — and every single one of the negative ratings was left without a word of explanation. The only two written reviews are both positive and both recent: one praises 'excellent post installation service and support', the other 'prompt quotations, friendly staff, quality work on-site'.
So what do you do with that? Honestly, a six-rating sample tells you very little — two or three silent one-star clicks can crater an average, and we have no way of knowing whether they reflect botched jobs, pricing disputes, or something else entirely. What we can say is that the written evidence (thin as it is) skews positive and recent, and the company itself is clearly real, local and long-running. We'd treat the 2.8 as a caution light, not a verdict: ask them about it directly, and ask for two or three recent references you can actually ring.
Reputation across the web New
The same firm, checked across platforms
⚑ 2.8-star Google rating — read the breakdown before judging
Half of Raymark's six Google ratings are one-star, which produces the low 2.8 average. None of the one-star raters wrote anything, so we can't tell you what went wrong — while the only two written reviews (from the last year or so) are positive about quoting, staff and workmanship. With a sample this small we'd call the rating unreliable in both directions. Raise it with the firm and ask for recent, contactable references before you commit.
Verified business details New
Checked against the public ABN register
Source: verified against the official Australian Business Register via ABN Lookup (abr.business.gov.au), including GST registration.
What they're actually known for New
Ranked by what customers mention — not a self-declared list
Who you'll actually deal with
The team
We couldn't put a name to the person running Raymark — no staff names appear in the six Google reviews, the website doesn't introduce an owner or team, and the company registration is in the corporate name rather than an individual's. So this reads as a company operation with an office (their contact is an office@ email address and a landline) rather than a one-man band.
That's not a criticism — a firm doing commercial work, cladding and scaffolding since 2000 is going to be structured that way — but it does mean you should ask who will actually quote, supervise and stand behind your job, because we can't tell you from public evidence.
Best for
- Re-roofing and new roof construction jobs, including commercial work — the core of what the firm pitches and is structured for
- Projects that need scaffolding or metal wall cladding handled by the same contractor
- Homeowners who weight a 26-year company registration and an actual premises over a thin review score
Less suited for
- Anyone who decides on Google ratings alone — 2.8 from six is the weakest score band, even if the breakdown muddies it
- People who want a rich public track record of recent customer feedback before engaging — it simply doesn't exist here
- Those who prefer dealing directly with a named owner-operator — the public evidence doesn't tell you who runs the show
Before you commit
Five questions worth asking
- Your Google rating shows three one-star ratings with no comments — can you tell us your side, and give us two or three recent customers we can ring as references?
- Who will quote and supervise our job, and will the work be done by your own employees or subcontractors?
- Can you provide a written, itemised quote and spell out exactly what workmanship warranty you offer?
- Your site mentions HIA and Master Builders memberships — are those current, and can you show proof of licensing and public liability insurance?
- If the job needs scaffolding, is that included in your quote since you do it in-house, or billed separately?
Bottom line
A genuinely established Mornington roofing company with 26 years on the register — but the weakest Google score of any band, built on silent one-star ratings the firm never got to answer. Worth a conversation and reference checks; not worth ruling in or out on the number alone.
Assessed by the editorial team at AustralianRoofers.com from public Google Business Profile data, the firm's own website, and the ABN register. Not a paid placement.
Compare nearby
Top-rated roofers in Hobart
Ranked by AustralianRoofers Trust Score — swipe to compare.
Contact Raymark Roofing Pty Ltd
This firm hasn't published an enquiry email we can verify, so the quickest way to reach them is by phone or through their Google profile.
Roofing knowledge base
Guides for homeowners and renovators
Plain-English answers to the most common Australian roofing questions.